Search for: All records

Hand gesture classification is crucial for the control of many modern technologies, ranging from virtual and augmented reality systems to assistive mechatronic devices. A prominent control technique employs surface electromyography (EMG) and pattern recognition algorithms to identify specific patterns in muscle electrical activity and translate these to device commands. While being well established in consumer, clinical, and research applications, this technique suffers from misclassification errors caused by limb movements and the weight of manipulated objects, both vital aspects of how we use our hands in daily life. An emerging alternative control technique is force myography (FMG) which uses pattern recognition algorithms to predict hand gestures from the axial forces present at the skin’s surface created by contractions of the underlying muscles. As EMG and FMG capture different physiological signals associated with muscle contraction, we hypothesized that each may offer unique additional information for gesture classification, potentially improving classification accuracy in the presence of limb position and object loading effects. Thus, we tested the effect of limb position and grasped load on 3 different sensing modalities: EMG, FMG, and the fused combination of the two. 27 able-bodied participants performed a grasp and release task with 4 hand gestures at 8 positions and under 5 object weight conditions. We then examined the effects of limb position and grasped load on gesture classification accuracy across each sensing modality. It was found that position and grasped load had statistically significant effects on the classification performance of the 3 sensing modalities and that the combination of EMG and FMG provided the highest classification accuracy of hand gesture, limb position, and grasped load combinations (97.34%) followed by FMG (92.27%) and then EMG (82.84%). This points to the fact that the addition of FMG to traditional EMG control systems offers unique additional data for more effective device control and can help accommodate different limb positions and grasped object loads. 

Wearable technologies for hand gesture classification are becoming increasingly prominent due to the growing need for more natural, human-centered control of complex devices. This need is particularly evident in emerging fields such as virtual reality and bionic prostheses, which require precise control with minimal delay. One method used for hand gesture recognition is force myography (FMG), which utilizes non-invasive pressure sensors to measure radial muscle forces on the skin’s surface of the forearm during hand movements. These sensors, typically force-sensitive resistors (FSRs), require additional circuitry to generate analog output signals, which are then classified using machine learning to derive corresponding control signals for the device. The performance of hand gesture classification can be influenced by the characteristics of this output signal, which may vary depending on the circuitry used. Our study examined three commonly used circuits in FMG systems: the voltage divider (VD), unity gain amplifier (UGA), and transimpedance amplifier (TIA). We first conducted benchtop testing of FSRs to characterize the impact of this circuitry on linearity, deadband, hysteresis, and drift, all metrics with the potential to influence an FMG system’s performance. To evaluate the circuit’s performance in hand gesture classification, we constructed an FMG band with 8 FSRs, using an adjustable Velcro strap and interchangeable circuitry. Wearing the FMG band, participants (N = 15) were instructed to perform 10 hand gestures commonly used in daily living. Our findings indicated that the UGA circuit outperformed others in minimizing hysteresis, drift and deadband with comparable results to the VD, while the TIA circuit excelled in ensuring linearity. Further, contemporary machine learning algorithms used to detect hand gestures were unaffected by the circuitry employed. These results suggest that applications of FMG requiring precise sensing of force values would likely benefit from use of the UGA. Alternatively, if hand gesture state classification is the only use case, developers can take advantage of benefits offered from using less complex circuitry such as the VD.